행정서식
발간물
지난달

2019.12

다음달
 1  2  3  4  5  6  7
 8  9  10  11  12  13  14
 15  16  17  18  19  20  21
 22  23  24  25  26  27  28
 29  30  31

 

 

 

 

 
제목 [석사학위논문] 세 가지 관점에서 바라본 세계시민교육 : 한국 비영리단체를 중심으로
작성자 관리자 등록일 2017-05-28
조회 556
파일
Master's Thesis

one Global Citizenship Education and the Three Different Interpretations: A case study of three Korean NPOs
세 가지 관점에서 바라본 세계시민교육 : 한국 비영리단체를 중심으로 박인영

2017년 2월
서울대학교 대학원
협동과정 글로벌교육협력 전공
박 인 영 (Inyoung PARK)


ABSTRACT

The purpose of the study is to reveal the perspectives on global citizenship
education underpinning the global citizenship education programs which are
launched since the adoption of the Global Education 2030 Agenda. Accordingly,
utilizing the multiple case study approach, this study reveals the program
managers’ perspectives on the concept of global citizenship education and the
perspectives that global citizenship education programs include. Also, it analyzes
the context of the launching of global citizenship education programs after the
adoption of the Global Education 2030 Agenda (SDG 4), particularly in the case
when there were already existing different types of adjectival education programs
provided by the organizations. Third, it analyzes the type, operation method, and
curriculum of the global citizenship education programs and the reasons for the
selection. The data utilized in this study is collected from the interviews with the five
program managers, program observations, program course books, documents, and
visual-auditory materials. The analytical framework is a conceptual framework
developed on the basis of literature and theories related to globalization, global
citizenship and education. This framework suggests three types of global
citizenship education based on the perspectives on global citizenship and the
educational approach: Competency-based GCED, Moral GCED, and Critical
GCED.
The major findings are as follows. First, it is found that the moral perspective
is dominant in the Korean NPOs’ education programs. Second, not only the Global
Education 2030 Agenda but also national educational policies or a private
corporates’ project influenced the launch of global citizenship education programs
in the NPOs. Third, the program types include an in-service teacher training
program, a global citizenship education instructor training and dispatching program,
and the classes for the youth. The reason why the training type of programs are
dominant is that it satisfies the external needs of global citizenship education
complementing the lack of the number of organizations’ staff. Also, it is considered
to be effective for the spread and promotion of global citizenship education.
This study provides some implications for the enhancement of global
citizenship education programs and follow-up studies. First, the possibility of
critical global citizenship education is discovered whereas the moral perspective is
currently dominant. If the critical perspective of GCED is more shared and
recognized by the program managers, teachers, and policy makers, critical GCED
would grow, and more agents for global justice would increase. Second, this study
examined the field of global citizenship education implementation and revealed the
influence of global agendas at the national level. Third, it is revealed that the ‘freesemester
system’ interplaying with the global citizenship education policies created
the demands and influenced the NPOs. Fourth, the role of NPOs is illuminated in
the spread of global citizenship education in Korean society. In the meantime, the
efforts for quality improvement are also called. Fifth, the study which examines the
influence of these programs on the learners, concerning the learners’ perspective,
and the correlation between the perspective of programs and learners is required as
follow-up studies. Moreover, if how the teachers who participated in the teacher
training programs practice in their schools is examined, the process of global
citizenship education spread and its perspective will be traced.


Keyword : Global Citizenship Education (GCED), The Global Education 2030
Agenda (SDG 4), the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the World
Education Forum, a multiple case study
 
다음글 [석사학위논문] 한국 교육 ODA의 결정요인 
이전글 [석사학위논문] 교사교육과 ICT 통합: 라오스 교원양성기관 사례를 중심으로